Best AI Code Tools

Cursor vs Amp

Short answer: Cursor is in AI IDEs; Amp is in CLI coding agents, so they solve different parts of the job. Cursor has the lower entry price ($8/month vs $20/month for Amp). Both Cursor and Amp have a free plan.

Visit Cursor Visit Amp

CursorAmp
TypeAI IDEsCLI coding agents
VendorAnysphereAmp (Sourcegraph)
StatusActiveActive
Free planYes (Free: limited agent and chat requests.)Yes (Hobby plan is free.)
Paid plans from$8/mo$20/mo
PlansFree: Free · Plus: $8 · Premium: $30 · Super: $100 · Ultra: $200 · Teams: $30 · Enterprise: —Hobby: Free · Individual (Megawatt): $20 · Teams: Free
Open sourceNot verified yetNot verified yet
Editors named on vendor pageterminal/CLIterminal/CLI
Features named on vendor pagecode review, code completion, background/cloud agents, MCP, SSO/SAMLMCP, self-hosting, code review, background/cloud agents, debugging, refactoring, bring your own key, SSO/SAML
Model families namedOpenAI GPT, Gemini, GrokOpenAI GPT, Claude
CheckedOct 26, 2026Oct 26, 2026

“Named on vendor page” means the phrase appears on the vendor's own page we captured; it is not a hands-on test. Unknown values are left blank rather than guessed.

FAQ

Is Cursor cheaper than Amp?

Cursor has the lower entry price ($8/month vs $20/month for Amp). Prices are from each vendor's pricing page.

Do Cursor and Amp have free plans?

Both Cursor and Amp have a free plan.

What is the difference between Cursor and Amp?

Cursor is in AI IDEs; Amp is in CLI coding agents, so they solve different parts of the job. Cursor is made by Anysphere; Amp is made by Amp (Sourcegraph). See the table for plans, editors and features each vendor names.

Sources

Alternatives

More comparisons

Lists with both tools